Legal Opinion

Stark v. United States

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 28, 1926No. 3614PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, District Judge.

Thé petition is drafted in the form of two separate causes of action. By the first cause of action the plaintiffs seek to recover from the United States the sum of $312,058.60, with interest, which, it is alleged, was illegally assessed, and paid under protest, as federal estate tax under the Act of Congress approved February 24,1919 (40 Stat. 1057), under the following circumstances:

Under date of January 14, 1915, the decedent, Jacob G. Sehmidlapp, executed a certain deed of trust to the Bankers’ Trust Company .of New York, whereby he transferred to such Bankers…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Keeney v. Comptroller of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Jones v. CliftonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Sav. Loan & Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  2. Ohio Locomotive Crane Co. v. DenmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  3. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
  4. Schotis v. North Coast Stevedoring Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1927
  5. Tips v. BassDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API