Schotis v. North Coast Stevedoring Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). [1,2] No issue is made to the direct statement in the petition for removal, that the relation of employer and employee did not exist between the alien defendants and the injured plaintiff, and the allegations in the complaint that the alien defendants are the owners of the vessel and employed the local defendant to unload cargo of the vessel, with the additional statement that the plaintiff was employed by the- defendants — the local defendant’s business being that of a stevedore to load and unload cargo — does not change the relation to employer and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Helms v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1903
- Jackson v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- City of Winfield v. Wichita Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eggleston v. Republic Steel CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1942
- Gardiner v. Agwilines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- D'Allesandro v. United Marine Contracting Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1928
- Hayat Carpet Cleaning Co. v. Northern Assur. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1933
- Williams v. Oceanic Stevedoring Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.