Etheridge Motors, Inc. v. Haynie
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, Presiding Judge.
Paragraphs 5 through 13 of the petition describe the building with particularity for the purpose of showing that, as to customers entering on the main floor from the Moreno Street entrance, the route to the paint shop in the basement was that followed by the plaintiff, and they constitute matter of inducement insofar as the injury itself is concerned. Facts so pleaded are merely introductory to the substance of the complaint and may be pleaded with less certainty and particularity than those facts upon which the plaintiff directly relies for recovery, but if they are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hill v. Davison-Paxon Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Pilgreen v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Anderson v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Hobbs v. HollimanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Watson v. McCrory Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Wood v. Hub Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Daneker v. MegrueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Garrison v. Rich'sCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Shier v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- WT Grant Company v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.