Legal Opinion
State v. Benton
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1998No. 97-897PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
The issue presented in this case is whether the Fourth Amendment’s proscription of unreasonable searches and seizures is violated by a random search of the residence of a parolee who, as a condition of parole, consented to warrantless searches by parole officers at any time. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that such searches are constitutional.
*318APPLICATION OF FOURTH AMENDMENT
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” See, also,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Isaac Andrew Baldon IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. KrousNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. NormanOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. TurekIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.