Legal Opinion

State of Iowa v. Isaac Andrew Baldon III

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 19, 2013No. 10–0214PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Chief Justice.

In this case, we must decide whether a provision in a written parole agreement that authorizes a parole officer or law enforcement officer to conduct a warrantless, suspicionless search of a parolee and the home, vehicle, and belongings of the parolee satisfies, by itself, the consent exception to the reasonableness and warrant requirements of the search and seizure clause of the Iowa Constitution. We conclude a parole agreement does not satisfy the consent exception, and we reverse the judgment and sentence of the district court. We remand the case for a new trial.

I.…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. State v. LyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. State of Iowa v. Denem Anthony NullSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. State of Iowa v. Kenneth Osborne ArySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. State of Iowa v. Justin Dean ShortSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  5. State of Iowa v. Zyriah Henry Floyd SchlitterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API