Legal Opinion

Frint v. Amato

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1929PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, Acting J.

The defendant assigns error as having been committed in the trial of said cause as follows:

Defendant, having been sworn as a witness in his own behalf, was asked the following question:

“You say you have been driving that truck on the streets of Portland how long?”

The question having been objected to as “incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial, and having no bearing on this case whatsoever,” the court sustained said objection.

The defendant’s counsel interrogated defendant, the driver of his car, as follows:

“Q. Do you know whether the Star car turned to the right or left before it hit you?
“A. He…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ward v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. PowersTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Hoag v. Washington-Oregon Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Graeter v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Foster v. FarraOregon Supreme Court · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Henderson v. Union Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Van Zandt v. GoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Vale v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API