Legal Opinion

Luterman v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1959No. Appeal, 386PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McBride,

The plaintiffs sued in trespass to recover for loss suffered by reason 0=1 damage caused by the flooding of their business premises by water which leaked from the city’s water line adjacent to their property. The jury’s verdict was for the defendant. Plaintiffs’ motion for new trial was based on instructions to the jury which, the plaintiffs contend, amounted, erroneously, to binding instructions for the defendant. The court below refused the motion for new trial and directed the entry of judgment on the verdict. The plaintiffs have appealed. It is a well settled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Streilein v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Philadelphia Ritz Carlton Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Hepler, Admrx. v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Schultz v. PivarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Glass v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Hepps v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. James v. FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Heffernan v. RosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Doyle v. South Pittsburgh Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API