Legal Opinion

Tide Products, Inc. v. Browning

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 26, 1973No. 8314PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOY, Justice,

In this venue case Tide Products> Im-has appealed from the trial court’s order overruling its plea of privilege. Affirmed.

Appellee brought this action against appellant on the theories of negligence and strict liability through breach of warranty, relying upon the doctrine of res ipsa loqui-tur as the result of the aerial application of chemicals by appellant to a peanut crop that appellee contended was damaged by the spraying operation.

Appellant contends that there was no evidence that the product furnished by Tide caused damage to appellee’s peanut crop, and that the finding of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Darryl v. Ford Motor CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hoover and Son v. OM Franklin Serum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Knight v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Two Rivers Company v. Curtiss Breeding Service, Division of Searle Agriculture Inc., Defendant- Hi-Pro Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Mid Continent Aircraft Corp. v. Curry County Spraying Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Mid Continent Aircraft Corp. v. Curry County Spraying Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Two Rivers Company v. Curtiss Breeding Service, Division of Searle Agriculture Inc., Defendant- Hi-Pro Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API