Legal Opinion

Pappe v. Trout

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kingfisher County. Action commenced October 25, 1892, in the district court of Kingfisher county, by J. L. Trout and M. J. Kane, against R. Eappe, to recover possession of certain real estate, held under a lease. Judgment in the court below for the recovery of the possession, and §230 as rent for the property. Pappe brings the case here on appeal. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dale, C. -J.:

October 25, 1892, J. L. Trout and M. J. Kane instituted a suit in ejectment in the district court of Kingfisher county, and in their complaint alleged that they were the owners in fee simple and entitled to the immediate possession of certain real estate, situated in Kingfisher city. They further alleged in their petition that on the 1st day of September, 1889, they leased the premises to R. Pappe, the defendant below, and that the condition of the lease had been broken by said Pappe in that he had refused to pay the rent, as prescribed in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nelson v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Huffman v. StarksIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Bethell v. McCoolIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Frakes v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. School District v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. BaldockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Isaacs v. De HonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  3. Shy v. BrockhauseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  4. Metropolitan Investment Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API