Hewitt v. L.E. Myers Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Hewitt v. L.E. Myers Co., 134 Ohio St.3d 199,
2012-Ohio-5317.] HEWITT, APPELLEE, v. L.E. MYERS COMPANY, APPELLANT, ET AL. [Cite as Hewitt v. L.E. Myers Co., 134 Ohio St.3d 199,
2012-Ohio-5317.] Workers’ compensation—Immunity of complying employer—Intentional tort by employer—R.C. 2745.01—“Equipment safety guard” construed. (No. 2011-2013—Submitted September 25, 2012—Decided November 20, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 96138,
2011-Ohio-5413. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT As used in R.C. 2745.01(C), “equipment safety guard” means a device…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HairstonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Columbus-Suburban Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- Stetter v. R.J. Corman Derailment Services, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.