Druke v. Town of Newfane
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDaley, J.
The plaintiffs own land in the town of Newfane that is adjacent to a popular swimming hole, known as the Williamsville swimming hole. Since 1971, the plaintiffs have objected to the indiscriminate use by the general public of an access route across their land to the swimming hole. In 1973, they instituted this civil action against the defendant-appellees to declare invalid the public right of way claimed by the defendants, or, in the alternative, to enjoin the indiscriminate use of the access by the general public. In their answers, the defendants claim to have acquired a right to use the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Folsom v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
- Town of Springfield v. NewtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
- Tallarico v. BrettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- President of Middlebury College v. Central Power Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Gardner v. Town of LudlowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Rule v. New Hampshire-Vermont Health ServiceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Smith v. Town of DerbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Town of South Hero v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Steven Daiello v. Town of Vernon v. Dale A. Merritt and Brenda MerrittSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.