Legal Opinion
A. Fred Dipo and Ray v. Lilenquist v. Ringsby Truck Lines, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1960No. 6311_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
In September, 1955, Dipo and Lilenquist entered into separate employment contracts with Ringsby Truck Lines, a corporation. 1 Each of them instituted an action against Ringsby to recover moneys alleged to be due him on the employment contract entered into with him. Ringsby filed a counterclaim in each case, seeking relief predicated on a written contract entered into in August, 1955, for the sale to Ringsby by Dipo, Lilenquist and Axel Nelson of all of the issued and outstanding stock of Inland Freight Lines, 2 Eastern Utah Transportation Company and Uintah Freight…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nash v. TowneSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Ephraim Theatre Company v. HawkUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. PetersenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- United Packinghouse Workers of America, a Labor Organization Affiliated With a.f.l.-c.i.o. v. Maurer-Neuer, Inc., a Kansas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Kelso v. KelsoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
3Cited by11 opinions
- Homestake-Sapin Partners v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- General Warehouse Two, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Texaco, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Wilmer M. Holsinger and Mary L. MoyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Local 9, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio v. Siegrist Construction Co., a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Socony Mobil Oil Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.