Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Razook
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 22, 1928No. 5172PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Circuit Judge.
This was an action against the Maryland Casualty Company on an instrument issued by it, called “water damage policy,” insuring one of the defendants in error “against all direct loss and damage caused” to described property located in Miami, Fla., “solely by'the accidental discharge, leakage, or precipitation of water or steam from the following sources: Plumbing system (not including automatic sprinkler system). Plumbing tanks (for the storage of water for the supply of the plumbing system). Steam or hot water heating pipes and radiators. Elevator tanks and cylinders.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shimer v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Commercial Union Assur. Co. v. Pacific Union ClubCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Richmond Coal Co. v. Commercial Union Assur. Co., Ltd., of London, EnglandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- World Fire & Marine Ins. v. Carolina Mills Distributing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- American Mfg. Corp. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Hanover Fire Ins. v. Newman's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Hardin Bag Burlap Co. v. Fidelity Guar. Fire Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Hardin Bag Burlap v. Fidelity Guaranty Fire Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942