Legal Opinion

Richmond Coal Co. v. Commercial Union Assur. Co., Ltd., of London, England

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1909No. 1,622PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error upon a policy of fire insurance issued by the defendant insuring the plaintiff against all direct loss or damage by fire on certain coal stored on the premises situated at the northwest corner of Howard and Spear streets, in the city of San Francisco, the policy, however, containing the provision that the insurance company—

“shall not be liable for loss caused directly or indirectly by invasion, earthquake, insurrection, riot, civil war or commotion, or military or usurped power, or by order of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Scheffer v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. The G. R. BoothSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. German Savings & Loan Society v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. RazookCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
  3. German Savings & Loan Society v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API