Legal Opinion

Crouse v. Volas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1934No. Appeal 524PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

On March 30, 1932, plaintiff, Frank Crouse, brought suit as the payee of a promissory note against the defendant, George C. Volas, as one of the makers. The note reads:

Easton, Pa.

“400 00/100 May 6th, 1930.

Ninety Days after date I promise to pay to the order of Frank Crouse

Four hundred ......................00/100 Dollars

Payable at

Without defalcation, for value received

No. Due

Geo. C. Volas Alex Cochios

[Endorsement on back]

George Volas.”

The case for the plaintiff consisted of the production of the note and the supporting testimony of the plaintiff and that of-’A lex…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McEvoy v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Candelore v. GlauserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Sallada v. MockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Lipkin v. American Ice Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Friedland v. Altoona & Logan Valley Electric Ry. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kvaternik v. YochimSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Blake v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Rice v. BauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Kuzma v. KuzmaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Cook AppealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API