Legal Opinion
Candelore v. Glauser
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 6, 1927No. Appeal, 265PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
At the trial of this ease, which was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from defendant’s negligence on January 24, 1925, the testimony of plaintiff, so far as it is relevant to the single point upon which we shall decide the case, is as follows:
“Q. As a result of these injuries were you out of work? A. Yes. Q. For how long? A. Four months....... Q. And you were out of work four months you say? A. Yes. Q. After the four months you returned to work at what place? A. I tried to get my job in the print works in Eddystone, but I…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McEvoy v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Gazzam v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Peterman v. EnggasserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Alston v. ShiverSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Hunter v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Frank v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Township of Perkiomen v. MestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.