Legal Opinion

Kuzma v. Kuzma

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1959No. Appeal, 93PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

On March 31, 1954, Andrew Koches instituted an action in assumpsit against John R. Kuzma to recover a loan of |2,000.00 allegedly made on February 8, 1949. Koches died on September 30, 1954, and his daughter, Anna Kuzma, administratrix, was substituted as plain tiff. The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant. The court en banc thereafter granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The defendant has appealed.

The record discloses that appellant and Koehes, as tenants in common, owned a hotel building in Homestead, in which Anna Kuzma operated a tavern. Appellant was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Helmig v. Rockwell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Fisher v. BrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. McEvoy v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Township of Perkiomen v. MestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. COM., EX REL. MEYERS v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Olynik v. LuceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Hilling v. Stinson Motor Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Mar Ray, Inc. v. StarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API