People v. Clark
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
Daniel D. Clark pled guilty to one count of residential burglary (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 459, 460). The imposition of sentence was suspended, and he was placed on probation in December 1994 for a period of three years. His probation was revoked in June 1995 for violating conditions of his probation. The trial court sentenced him to a prison term of four years.
Clark appeals. His sole assignment of error is that his admission to the probation violations was invalid because it was not preceded by proper admonitions by the trial court. The Attorney General argues the appeal must be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. LeivaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. FreidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. LeivaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.