Legal Opinion

Fitch v. Commission on Judicial Performance

California Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1995No. S041217PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

Judge John Fitch of the Fresno County Superior Court, acting in propria persona, has petitioned for review of a unanimous recommendation by the Commission on Judicial Performance (Commission) that he be publicly censured for conduct which the Commission has found to constitute “conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute.” (See Cal. Const., art. VI, § 18, subd. (c) [hereafter section 18(c)]; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 919(b).)

The bases for the Commission’s censure recommendation are that, between 1988 and 1992,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Wenger v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Gubler v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kennick v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weeks v. Baker & McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Dodds v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. MISSISSIPPI COM'N ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE v. SpencerMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  4. John Doe v. Westmont Coll., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against McGuireNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API