Legal Opinion

Shoop v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 28, 2007No. 1-05-3213PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

Plaintiff, Darrell E. Shoop, filed suit against defendant Daimler-Chrysler Corporation for breach of express and implied warranties under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty — Federal Trade Commission Act (Magnuson-Moss Act) (15 U.S.C. §§2308, 2310(d) (2000)), when his vehicle required numerous repairs. When plaintiff received more than the fair market value for his car on trade-in, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiff did not suffer a present injury. The trial court granted defendant’s motion. Because we find that a genuine issue of material fact existed as to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Sorce v. Naperville Jeep Eagle, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Szajna v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McCabe v. Daimler AGDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
  2. Oggi Trattoria & Caffe, Ltd. v. Isuzu Motors America, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. ExxonMobil Oil Corp. v. Amex Const. Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  4. Budnick Converting, Inc. v. Nebula Glass International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2012
  5. Rose v. Mercedes-Benz U.S.A. LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API