Legal Opinion

Rose v. Mercedes-Benz U.S.A. LLC

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 28, 2007No. 1—06—0262, 1—06—1266 consPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gallagher

Plaintiff Felice Bressler Rose brought an action under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty — Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act (the Magnuson-Moss Act) (15 U.S.C. §2301 et seq. (2000)) for breach of express and implied warranties against defendant Mercedes-Benz after several unsuccessful attempts to repair her 2002 Mercedes ML 500. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment for plaintiff and awarded her $8,000 in damages.

Defendant now appeals the damage award and the award of attorney fees and costs to plaintiff. Defendant raises three main contentions pertaining to the damage…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Kim v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Bartow v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Valenti v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Kolstad v. RankinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walker v. DartAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  2. Brookbank v. OlsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Brookbank v. OlsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API