Legal Opinion

Zeller v. Pikovsky

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1938No. File No. 8078PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, P.J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries and for property damage which he claims were caused by the negligence of the defendant. The verdict of the jury was for the plaintiff and judgment was entered thereon. A motion for new trial was overruled, and defendant appeals.

On March 4, 1935, at about 3 o’clock ’in tlie afternoon, plaintiff was driving his Ford sedan west on Highway No. xo near Lake City. Defendant was operating a truck, traveling east. The automobile in which plaintiff was riding collided with truck. The grounds of negligence alleged are that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Descombaz v. KlockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Campbell v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dwyer v. PetersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Harvison v. HerrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Albers v. OttenbacherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Thompson v. SummersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. McCleod v. Tri-State Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Alley v. SiepmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Fritz v. Howard TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API