Legal Opinion
Qureshi v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 30, 2011No. 11-30047PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
The Qureshis were originally granted asylum from Pakistan because of Mr. Qureshi’s support for the Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front. Later, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) decided to terminate the Qureshis’ asylum based on that same support, applying the “persecutor bar” to Mr. Qureshi. When removal proceedings ensued, the Qureshis sued USCIS to challenge its application of the bar. The district court granted US-CIS’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that the termination was not a final agency action.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- American Airlines, Inc. v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Cabaccang v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Jama v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Jie Fang v. Dir. U.S. Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Franciscan Alliance, Inc. v. BurwellDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- Belle Co. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.