Legal Opinion
Republic Royalty Co. v. Evins
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided August 29, 1996No. 13-96-309-CV, 13-96-319-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEERDEN, Chief Justice.
The present mandamus actions involve a dispute between two Hidalgo County district courts over jurisdiction concerning cases that have been consolidated and ordered transferred back and forth between the 139th District Court and the 370th District Court. Interconnected with this dispute is a related issue concerning the effect of the attempted disqualification of the judge of the 139th District Court. We conclude that mandamus relief is appropriate to settle the present dispute.
Republic Royalty Co. (Republic) filed the first lawsuit in December of 1994, against…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Camarena v. Texas Employment CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Abor v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Curtis v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Roberts v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- in Re: Kerry Max Cook, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2012
- In Re Rio Grande Valley Gas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Davis v. Crist Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- In Re Frost National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.