Legal Opinion
Harrison v. City of Clarksville, Tenn.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided January 23, 1990No. 3:88-0954PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant, City of Clarksville’s (City), motion for summary judgment against 34 plaintiffs (designated plaintiffs), all of whom were hired by defendant as firefighters after the compensation changes at issue in this suit took effect. On August 21, 1989, 732 F.Supp. 804, this court held that the actions taken by the City were valid under Tennessee law. The Court also held that the implementation of shifts longer than 24 hours was bona fide under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., as amended (FLSA), as applied…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Beebe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brian F. Monahan v. County Of Chesterfield, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Monahan v. County of ChesterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Burgess v. Catawba CountyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1992
- Zoltek v. Safelite Glass Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Rotondo v. City of Georgetown, SCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.