Legal Opinion
Burgess v. Catawba County
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided November 2, 1992No. ST-C-90-11PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MULLEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon (1) Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, (2) Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, and (3) Plaintiffs’ motion to strike Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. This Order applies only to Plaintiff Jackson, as additional discovery is being conducted by Plaintiff Burgess relating to an issue of exemption.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
This action was originally brought by 28 emergency medical service (“EMS”) personnel employed by Catawba County to enforce their right to overtime guaranteed by the Fair Labor Standards Act…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arthur Coleman v. Jiffy June Farms, Inc., James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Jiffy June Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Robert W. Kohlheim, Cross-Appellees v. Glynn County, Georgia, a Political Subdivision of the State of Georgia, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Burnley v. ShortCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Brian F. Monahan v. County Of Chesterfield, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Flood v. New Hanover CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Monahan v. County of ChesterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Quirk v. Baltimore County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Dingwall v. Friedman Fisher Associates, P.C.District Court, N.D. New York · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.