Marlowe v. State

Writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of having carnal intercourse with an unmarried female, under the age of eighteen years, of previous chaste character.

The plaintiff in error presents eight questions for our consideration.

The first and third questions challenge the sufficiency of the evidence.

The evidence has been' examined and found to be sufficient to sustain the verdict.

The second question challenges the harmony of the verdict with the charge of the court. We find no basis for this contention.

The fourth, seventh and eighth questions challenge the action…