State v. Reavis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
■ Defendant first assigns as error the denial of his motion to quash the bill of indictment. A motion to quash, inter alia, challenges the sufficiency of the bill of indictment to charge an offense. State v. Mayo, 267 N.C. 415, 148 S.E. 2d 257; State v. Faulkner, 241 N.C. 609, 86 S.E. 2d 81. The requirements for a sufficient bill of indictment are as follows: (1) The offense is charged in a plain, intelligible, and explicit manner; (2) The offense is charged properly so as to avoid the possibility of double jeopardy; and (3) There is such certainty in the statement of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. MOORE, IISupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. CuthrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Evanson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- In re S.R.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Burgess v. GriffinDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.