Legal Opinion
Prince v. Prince
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn A. Garbarino, J.
The petitioner in this matrimonial proceeding is a recipient of public assistance from the New York Department of Social Services. In the above-entitled proceeding, she originally sought an order compelling either the City of New York or the State of New York to pay the cost of service of a summons for divorce by publication.
The court is aware that in matrimonial actions there is no provision for substituted service, and that CPLR. 316 and section 232 of the Domestic Relations Law call for publication of a summons when personal service within or without the State is not feasible. The problem…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- Deason v. DeasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Deason v. DeasonNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Badenhop v. BadenhopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Al-Dohan v. KouyoumjianNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Arroyo v. ArroyoNew York Supreme Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.