Olushola Akinmboni v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
McLEESE, Associate Judge:
Appellant Olushola Akinmboni challenges his convictions for possession of a controlled substance (marijuana and ben-zylpiperazine or “BZP”) and possession of drug paraphernalia. Mr. Akinmboni argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence as obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. We reverse.
I
Viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court’s suppression ruling, the evidence was as follows. On April 11, 2013, Metropolitan Police Department Officers Zachary Blier and Herbert Nichols saw Mr. Akinmboni driving a car with a broken…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- IN RE GRAND JURY WITNESS G.B. v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- IN RE GRAND JURY WITNESS G.B. v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Lewis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Parker & Rollerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025