Legal Opinion

Howard D. Popky Sheila A. Popky v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 17, 2005No. 04-2798PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Howard and Sheila Popky, husband and wife, appeal from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in the government’s favor in connection with their attempt to recover monies obtained by the government in satisfaction of a tax hen. Appellants contend that the federal tax hen could not attach to Sheila Popky’s interest in property owned by her and her husband as tenants by the entireties. We disagree and will therefore affirm the judgment of the District Court.

As we write solely for the parties, and the facts are known to them, we will…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Clingerman v. SadowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Brose EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Interboro Bank and Trust Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. In Re LevinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. United States v. Gary CardaciCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. McArthurDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2014
  5. United States v. BarczykDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API