Legal Opinion

United States v. Barr

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 4, 2010No. 09-1710PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J., joined by Greer, D.J.,

BATCHELDER, C.J. (pp. 377-80), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

The Government seeks to foreclose the federal income tax debt owed by Charles Barr against the home that he and his wife Carolyn own as tenants by the entirety. Mrs. Ban- argues on appeal, as she did before the district court, that she is entitled to the vast majority of the sale proceeds of any foreclosure sale and that foreclosure is not appropriate based on her dominant interest in the home and other equitable factors. Because spouses owning property as tenants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. 564.54 Acres of Monroe and Pike County LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Paddock v. SiemoneitTexas Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Gary CardaciCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. WinsperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Diane DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Barr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API