Legal Opinion

Cozzone v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 2013PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CASTILLE.

This appeal presents an issue of statutory interpretation concerning Section 413(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (“Act”), 77 P.S. § 772: specifically, whether the claimant/appellant1 should have been permitted to proceed on a post>-500week petition for reinstatement of total disability benefits where he filed that petition within three years of his most recent payment of compensation, a payment which was made pursuant to a post-500week supplemental agreement, notwithstanding a prior suspension of payments due to his return to work without a loss in earning…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Kelly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Newman Development Group of Pottstown, LLC v. Genuardfs Family Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Martin v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Overmiller v. D. E. Horn & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Kohl v. New Sewickley Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Gilbert, R. v. Synagro Central ApltsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Trust Agrmt. of E. Taylor Appeal of: Wells FargoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API