Legal Opinion
Hardy v. Powell
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 10, 2018No. Case No. 1:16–cv–01572 (TNM)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TREVOR N. MCFADDEN, United States District Judge *360Felicia Hardy and Barry Pope seek $10 million in this Title VII retaliation case against Jerome Powell, whom they have sued in his official capacity as Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.1 As personal representatives of the estate of Andre Hardy, they allege that the Federal Reserve drove Mr. Hardy to commit suicide by retaliating against him for engaging in activity protected by Title VII. Because the Plaintiffs cannot show that they have exhausted their retaliation claims and because they cannot show that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dorothy Perkins v. Megan J. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Dorothy Perkins v. Megan J. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Flores v. Morehead Dotts Rybak, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2022