Legal Opinion
State v. McGill
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 3, 2002No. 47686-6-IPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
47 P.3d 173 (2002)
112 Wash.App. 95
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
O'Keith (NMI) McGILL, Appellant.
No. 47686-6-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
June 3, 2002.
Cheryl D. Aza, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, for Appellant.
Melinda J. Young, King County Prosecutors Office, Seattle, for Respondent.
AGID, J.
O'Keith McGill appeals his sentence on three drug convictions, asserting that (1) the sentencing court erred in failing to recognize that it had authority to impose an exceptional sentence and (2) he did not have effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because his attorney…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. PryorWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. Garcia-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HerzogWashington Supreme Court · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- In re the Personal Restraint of MulhollandWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State Of Washington, V Guadalupe Solis DiazCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State v. AdamyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.