Legal Opinion
Ferren v. General Motors Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 15, 1993No. 91-083PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire {Stahl, J.) has certified the following questions of law for our consideration under Supreme Court Rule 34, concerning suit by Dennis and Judith Ferren (the Ferrens), New Hampshire residents, against General Motors Corporation (GMC) for injuries allegedly suffered as a result of Mr. Ferren’s exposure to lead dust while employed at GMC’s Kansas plant:
“1. Whether the substantive law-of New Hampshire or of Kansas governs this action;
2. If the substantive law of New Hampshire applies, whether the New Hampshire workers’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. YatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Heath v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- LaBounty v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- McCann v. Foster Wheeler LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Hall v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Tullis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Vicki Pounders v. Enserch E&C IncArizona Supreme Court · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.