Legal Opinion

Hall v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1998No. Docket 196929PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, P.J.

i

NATURE of the case

Plaintiff’s personal injury, products liability claim against General Motors Corporation raises a choice-of-law question of first impression under Michigan law: is plaintiff’s residency at the time of injury or at the time of filing suit controlling? Because plaintiff resided in North Carolina when injured, and in Michigan when he brought suit, we must decide which residency controls. This determination will dictate the outcome of plaintiff’s claim because, other than the residency of plaintiff, all significant factors here point to the application of North Carolina law.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Miller v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Sutherland v. Kennington Truck Service, LtdMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Farrell v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. O'BRIEN v. Grumman Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. The Standard Fire Insurance Co v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Tullis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. CMACO Automotive Systems, Inc. v. Wanxiang America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Atlas Technologies, LLC v. LevineDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  5. In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API