McCloskey v. Kirk
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 142 and 143, Oct. T., 1913, by plaintiffs, from decrees of C. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1912, No. 3039, Docket C., in Equity, and No. 3117, Docket A, in Equity, dismissing bills in equity to enforce a building restriction in case of Louis J. McCloskey and William T. Waite v. William H. Kirk, and in case of Louis J. McCloskey and William T. Waite v. C. E. Kirk. Bill in equity to enforce a building restriction.
Read the full summary
Appeals, Nos. 142 and 143, Oct. T., 1913, by plaintiffs, from decrees of C. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1912, No. 3039, Docket C., in Equity, and No. 3117, Docket A, in Equity, dismissing bills in equity to enforce a building restriction in case of Louis J. McCloskey and William T. Waite v. William H. Kirk, and in case of Louis J. McCloskey and William T. Waite v. C. E. Kirk. Bill in equity to enforce a building restriction. Miller, P. J., who specially presided, filed the following findings of fact, conclusions of law and opinion: The question is, whether a dotted line in a recorded plan of…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam,
The decrees appealed arise from substantially the same facts. They are affirmed on the findings of fact and law and the opinion of Judge Milleb, specially presiding, filed in No. 142.
2Cited by22 opinions
- Jones v. Park Lane for Convalescents, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Baederwood, Inc. v. MoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- DeSanno v. EarleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- J. C. Grille, Inc. Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Ladner v. SiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.