Lafayette Agricultural Works v. Phillips
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.
The appellant sued the appellee on a promissory note, executed by the appellee to the appellant.
The defendant answered: A general denial.
2. That the note was given for and in consideration of the purchase by the defendant of a combined reaper and mower. *260of the Buckeye pattern; that at the time of the purchase-the plaintiff warranted that the machine would perform all the requisites of ordinary mowing; that the defendant, relying upon said warranty and representation, then and there purchased the machine, and executed the note described in the complaint. It is then alleged that at the time of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mooklar v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Howard v. CadwaladerIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
3Cited by18 opinions
- Robinson Machine Works v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Brower v. NellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Kenwood Tire Co. v. SpeckmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- McClamrock v. FlintIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.