Legal Opinion

Connolly v. Gishwiller

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 19, 1947No. 9241PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERNER, Circuit Judge.

Harry E. Hallenbeck as receiver of Calumet National Bank of Chicago originally brought this action to recover alleged illegal profits claimed to have been derived by defendants, pursuant to a conspiracy, through the sale of various assets of the receivership for less than their actual value. Appellee, under appointment by the Comptroller of the Currency, is the present receiver of the bank. There were originally thirty-two defendants. When the decree was entered, appellants were the only defendants held liable.

The material allegations of the complaint are that defendant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. The People v. SmallIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Dixmoor Golf Club Inc. v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Majewski v. GallinaIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. United States v. William E. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1969
  4. Stamford Municipal Employees' Credit Union, Inc. v. Edwards (In Re Edwards)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
  5. Brumby Metals, Inc. v. BargenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API