Legal Opinion

Ford v. Philadelphia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1941No. Appeals, 56 and 190PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

An action in trespass was brought by plaintiff against the City of Philadelphia to recover damages for injuries sustained by her as the result of a fall occasioned by a defective sidewalk. The city, the original defendant, by writs of scire facias under the Act of April 10, 1929, P. L. 479, as last amended by the Act of June 25, 1937, P. L. 2118, No. 428, 12 PS §141,, brought upon the record, as additional defendants, the Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company and Albert Hart and Phyllis Hart, his wife. The city averred that the Fidelity-Phila-. delphia Trust Company was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Appel v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. McLaughlin v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Philadelphia v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Bruder v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Rudman Et Ux. v. City of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Toth v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Flynn v. ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Brady v. Philadelphia (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Gerber v. Jones (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API