Legal Opinion
Freeland v. Iridium World Communications Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 3, 2008No. Civil Action 99-1002PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs class, as holders of various securities of Iridium World Communications, Ltd. (IWCL), sued Defendant Motorola, Inc. (Motorola), the lone-remaining defendant, for securities fraud under Sections 10(b) and 20 of the Securities Act of 1934 and Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as SEC Rule 10b-5. The following motions are before the Court: (1) Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment under the Doctrine of Collateral Estoppel [Doc. # 203]; (2) Motorola’s Motion for Summary Judgment on All Claims [Doc. #204]; (3)…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- ['U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. E-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Allstate Life Insurance v. Robert W. Baird & Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ludwig & Robinson, PLLC v. BiotechPharma, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Barnett v. PA Consulting Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.