Miller v. Life & Casualty Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
A thorough review of the evidence discloses that the plaintiff’s grandson had hemophilia from birth; that he died as a result of an injury, which was aggravated by his disease. Further, the evidence shows that neither the accident nor the disease likely would have independently produced death. The cases relied on by the plaintiff in his contention that a new trial should have been granted on the general grounds, have been thoroughly reviewed. We must agree that the language employed in those cases, Thornton v. Travelers Ins. Co., 116 Ga. 121 (42 S. E. 287, 94 Am. St. Rep.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thornton v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Hall v. General Accident Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. KellarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Harris v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cheney v. Bell National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Pippin v. Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Arata v. California-Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Cook v. Life Ins. Co. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Interstate Life & Accident Insurance v. UpshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.