Legal Opinion

Stowe v. Bologna

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1994PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

This is an appeal from a determination by a single justice of this court of the amount of reasonable appellate attorney’s fees to which the plaintiffs are entitled. In Stowe v. Bologna, 415 Mass. 20 (1993), after affirming the Superior Court’s judgment for the plaintiffs on their claims that the defendants had violated the Cambridge Rent Control Act, St. 1976, c. 36, § 11 (a), we referred the case to a single justice to determine the amount of reasonable appellate attorney’s fees to be awarded to the plaintiffs based on their appropriate submissions. Although the plaintiffs submitted numerous…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Stratos v. Department of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Robbins v. RobbinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Stowe v. BolognaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Stowe v. BolognaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Killeen v. Westban Hotel Venture, LPMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. TAL Financial Corp. v. CSC Consulting, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Global Investors Agent Corp. v. National Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  5. WHTR Real Estate Ltd. Partnership v. Venture Distributing, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API