Legal Opinion

Adams v. County of San Joaquin

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1958No. Civ. 9377PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Plaintiff filed a verified claim with the Board of Supervisors of San Joaquin County, pursuant to section 439.56 of the Agricultural Code, to recover damages in the sum of $240 for the loss of 12 sheep allegedly killed by dogs. Section 439.56 reads as follows:

“Each such claim shall be verified by the affidavits of two disinterested witnesses who shall fix the value of the livestock, the affidavits to be executed within four days after the finding of the carcasses of each animal and to establish the fact beyond reasonable doubt that the animal was killed by a dog or dogs. Such claims shall be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Schessler v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Irvine v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Kessloff v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Wexler v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walker v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Osseous Technologies of America, Inc. v. DiscoveryOrtho Partners LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Lomanto v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API