Legal Opinion

Louise Orebo and Tom Gore, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1961No. 17285_1PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Cricuit Judge.

Appellants stand convicted of selling and concealing narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. The Government’s principal witness Louis Peterson, was a paid informer, who had been previously convicted of narcotics violations.

The said informer testified directly to several meetings with appellants, during two of which the alleged violations of federal law took place. The informer’s testimony was in most part corroborated by regular federal agents who “supervised” his dealings with appellants. The details of the actual delivery of the drug took place during a very limited…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
  4. Alfredo Delgado Arellanes and Geneva Arellanes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Posey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API