North Hudson County Railway Co. v. Flanagan
Supreme Court of New Jersey
In error to the Hudson Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
*237The opinion of the court was delivered by-
Van Syckel, J.
This is an action brought by Flanagan, an infant, to recover damages for personal injuries.
The first question presented by the case is, whether the act of March 25th 1881 (Pamph. L., p. 257), applies to a street railway.
The act reads as follows:
Section 1. “ That all actions hereafter occurring for injuries caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of any railroad corporation owning or operating any railroad within this state, shall be commenced and sued within two- years next after the cause of such actions shall have accrued and…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Rodgers v. PittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1899
- Conover v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1910