Legal Opinion

Conover v. Public Service Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 30, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On demurrer to declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Minturr, J.

The concrete inquiry presented in this ease by the demurrer to the declaration is whether paragraph 3, section 1, of chapter 83 of the laws of 1909 (Pamph. L., p. 114), popularly known as the Employers’ Liability act, applies to the suit of an injured employe of a street railway company, whose injury is admittedly the result of the negligence of a fellow-servant.

The section in question provides, inter alia, that the employer shall be liable for the injury or death of an employe, avIio in the exercise of reasonable care is injured or killed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Love v. CosgraveNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Mayor of Newark v. Merchants' InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  3. North Hudson County Railway Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Ayres v. DauchertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. Safeway Trails, Inc. v. FurmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. Allgaier v. Township of WoodbridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API