Legal Opinion
State v. Cerny
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided August 31, 2000No. 13-99-457-CRPublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice HINOJOSA.
Appellee, Jeffrey Cerny, was charged with the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. Appellee moved to suppress the evidence, claiming his “arrest and detention was made without a warrant contrary to Article I, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 14 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,” thus, rendering inadmissible all evidence subsequently obtained. The trial court granted the motion.
The State appeals, claiming the trial court erred in granting the motion. The State presents one issue for our review: May an officer stop, detain and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- State v. CortezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Cook v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Leming v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Mahaffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.