Legal Opinion
United States v. Mannino
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 15, 2000No. 98-1748UnknownCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
McKEE, Circuit Judge.
Ignazio Antonino Mannino (“Tony”) and Emanuele Salvatore Mannino (“Sal”) appeal the denial of petitions they filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in which they sought to vacate, set aside or correct sentences imposed on them following convictions for charges arising from their involvement in a heroin distribution conspiracy. We hold that the defendants’ sentencings did not conform to Amendment 78 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines or our holding in United States v. Collado, 975 F.2d 985 (3d Cir.1992), and we will therefore vacate their sentences and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Ignazio Antonino Mannino, A/K/A Nino (d.c. No. 89-Cr-00003-2) United States of America v. Emanuele Salvatore Mannino, A/K/A Sal (d.c. No. 89-Cr-00003-4) Ignazio Antonino Mannino and Emanuele Salvatore ManninoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Lenny Ross v. Administrator East Jersey State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- Kent Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
- Roy Moses v. District Attorney PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
- Anthony Abbatiello v. Brian Emig, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.